|
Recommendations
for Budget 2005
back to Table of Contents
National
Conservation Fund
Summary
Recommendation: that the federal government make a leadership
investment of $250 million into a highly leveraged National Conservation
Fund. This initial investment should be matched by all levels of governments,
non-governmental organizations, community groups and others by a target
of 3:1. The fund would support priority conservation initiatives on
the ground on a project-by-project basis.
Investment
$250 million leadership investment to be leveraged by partners
Benefits
for Canadians
-
restore
Canadas international leadership in nature conservation by
helping fulfil existing commitments
-
stretch
Canadians tax dollars to achieve Canadas conservation
goals more efficiently and effectively on the ground
-
engage
hundreds of thousands of Canadians in conservation through partnerships
with the voluntary sector
-
contribute
to a new and better relationship with aboriginal people by supporting
their full participation in conservation and land-use planning on
their traditional territories
-
more
certainty for all sectors, as a result of accelerated land use and
conservation planning
-
better
protection for national parks and other protected areas by supporting
stewardship of surrounding lands
Background
and rationale:
It is only by working together as governments, industries,
Aboriginal peoples and others that we can secure our natural
capital for our own and the worlds benefit.74
Canada
is recognized internationally for its natural wealth and diversity.
We have committed on the world stage to strong conservation measures
through such agreements as the United Nations Convention on Biological
Diversity (CBD) and the CBD Programme of Work on Protected Areas, as
well as the Canadian Biodiversity Strategy. Over the past decade there
has been some progress on federal conservation initiatives, particularly
on the legislative front75. However, these first steps alone
are not enough to achieve strong conservation measures on the ground.
While
the vision of conserving our national biological diversity can be articulated,
encouraged and even led by the federal government, responsibilities
for land management are shared with provincial, territorial, municipal
and First Nations governments. In addition, conservation groups, community
groups, universities, private citizens and the private sector all have
an important role to play in achieving conservation objectives. In other
words, a national goal is not the exclusive responsibility of the federal
government, but requires broad participation from all sectors of Canadian
society.
Many
Canadian organizations and individuals have valuable skills and resources
to contribute to a shared goal of nature conservation. By investing
in this leadership conservation fund, the federal government would provide
an incentive to bring these potential partners to the table, as well
as to leverage the funds to achieve greater results. Working together
is clearly more effective than going it alone.
Modeled
in part on the existing federal-provincial infrastructure program, and
supported by the National Round Table on Environment and Economys
report on Nature Conservation76, our proposal for a leveraged
National Conservation Fund will provide not only good economic value,
but will encourage creativity and flexibility in conservation initiatives.
Partnership
conservation programs such as the Natural Legacy 2000 initiative conserved
hundreds of thousands of acres of Canadas vast wilderness areas,
and conducted research on endangered species recovery and conservation
planning. Furthermore, through this program, conservation groups levered
a federal investment of $10 million and delivered a program worth almost
$40 million on the ground. Applying this formula to a National Conservation
Fund means that $1 billion of conservation value could be achieved from
a $250 million federal leadership investment.A National Conservation
Fund should focus support on the following key priorities:
-
supporting
the participation of all interests in integrated science-based land
use and conservation planning to ensure conservation decisions are
made before opportunities are foreclosed by industrial development
-
private
land conservation and stewardship programs
-
capacity
building for aboriginal communities to lead land use planning and
resource management processes in their traditional territories
-
maintaining
and restoring the ecological integrity of protected areas by supporting
conservation initiatives on surrounding lands
Recommendation:
A $250 million federal leadership investment in a National Conservation
Fund to be matched by all levels of governments, non-governmental organizations,
community groups and others by a target of 3:1. This investment could
result in conservation outcomes with a value of up to $1 billion
a strong return on taxpayers investment.
Alternative
and Complementary Policies
Canada has international and national commitments to conservation that
have yet to be fulfilled. The federal government could work independently
to fulfil the commitments for which there is clear federal jurisdiction.
However, this approach would be less efficient and effective than working
cooperatively with all interests. A leadership investment in a highly
leveraged National Conservation Fund would support a cooperative, efficient
approach to conservation that would complement existing federal programs.
Contact
Julie Gelfand
Nature Canada,
613-562-3447 ext.231
top
of page
|
74
|
Securing
Canadas Natural Capital: A Vision for Nature Conservation
in the 21st Century. National Round Table on the Environment
and the Economy, 2003, 125pp. (p 95).
|
|
75
|
Since
2000, the federal government has committed to a five year action
plan for national parks; passed a new National Parks Act, National
Marine Conservation Areas Act, Species at Risk Act; and has implemented
such measures as reducing capital gains tax on the donation of
ecological gifts, and committing funds to clean up toxic sites.
|
|
76
|
Securing
Canadas Natural Capital: A Vision for Nature Conservation
in the 21st Century. National Round Table on the Environment
and the Economy, 2003, 125pp. see Recommendation 19 (p. 90)
|
|