|
Recommendations
for Budget 2005
back to Table of Contents
Green
Cars
Protecting the Climate and Canadian Jobs
Summary
The global campaign against climate change is going to dramatically
alter the domestic auto industry, a pillar of Canadas economy.
The federal government must ensure that this sector remains competitive
by creating demand for more climate friendly vehicles while supporting
the made-in-Canada manufacture of these same vehicles.
Investment
$500+ million over five years.
Benefits
for Canadians
-
meet
Canadas Kyoto target for passenger vehicles
-
reduce
smog causing pollutants such as sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides
and particulate matter and protect the health of Canadians
-
reinforce
global progress toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions, spurring
investment and employment in fuel cell and hybrid vehicle manufacturing
and R&D
-
ensure
that Canadas auto industry is strengthened by the global trend
toward more climate friendly vehicles
Background
and Rationale
Cars and light trucks produce 12 per cent of Canadas greenhouse
gas emissions and are the largest single source of emissions in the
transportation sector. Because fuel economy standards have not changed
since the mid-1980s, carmakers have directed design improvements to
everything but fuel efficiency. Worse, carmakers have also marketed
vehicles such as SUVs as passenger vehicles, pushing emissions up still
higher. Emissions from light-duty trucks, such as SUVs, have increased
80 per cent since 1990.
The
federal governments Climate Change Plan 2002 commits the federal
government to reducing greenhouse gas emissions from passenger vehicles
by 5.2 megatonnes by 2010.13 To achieve this target, the
federal government sought to negotiate a voluntary reduction with carmakers,
but after four years of negotiations carmakers have refused to do their
part for Kyoto.
Canada
should look to California for a new policy framework for getting more
climate friendly vehicles on Canadian roads. In 2002, California enacted
legislation requiring carmakers to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from
their vehicles and is currently considering regulations that set an
emissions reduction target of 30 per cent by 2015.14 North
Eastern U.S. states such as New York, Vermont and Massachusetts have
already expressed their intention to adopt Californias new regulations,
comprising approximately 30 per cent of the North American auto market.15
Canada would help drive a continental shift to cleaner vehicles by enacting
regulations similar to Californias.
This
movement toward cleaner cars at the state level in the U.S. should also
be a wake-up call for Canada. The auto industry accounts for approximately
one-quarter of total Canadian exports, making it Canadas largest
export sector with 97 per cent of our automotive exports going
to the United States.
Internationally,
Japan, the European Union and Australia are already reducing greenhouse
gas emissions from their vehicle fleet.
Automakers
are attempting to resist and forestall these global trends toward more
climate friendly vehicles. To protect Canadian jobs and the environment,
the federal government must be proactive and develop a strategy to ensure
that Canadas auto industry adapts and is strengthened by the global
campaign against climate change.
Regulation
is key to any policy package that aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from vehicles, especially if the federal government is to ensure fair
competition among carmakers. The federal government also has a role
to play in building demand for more climate friendly vehicles. Both
consumer incentives and an effective government procurement policy are
two means of building demand.
On
the supply side, the federal government should encourage the production
of greener vehicles in Canada by supporting investment in manufacturing
facilities for the production of climate friendly vehicles. Opportunities
already exist - General Motors is evaluating whether to build hybrid
vehicles at both its Ingersoll and Oshawa facilities.
Recommendations
-
Establish
regulations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from passenger vehicles,
co-ordinating efforts with California and other U.S. states.
-
Speed
the market penetration of cleaner vehicles by mandating that all
government vehicle purchases be low emission vehicles (any car that
emits less than 130 grams of GHG per km). Presently less than 15
per cent of the 3,000 vehicles purchased annually by the federal
government meet its own definition of a green vehicle.
-
Establish
a 100,000 Green Car campaign (any car that emits less
than 130 grams of GHG per km or any light-truck that emits less
than 190 grams of GHG per km16) providing $4,000 to consumers
as well as a $500 incentive to dealer for the purchase of a low-emission
vehicles. This performance based rebate would be eliminated when
Canadas regulations limiting greenhouse gas emissions from
passenger vehicles come into effect in 2010. This measure would
cost approximately $450 million over 5 years.
-
Provide
businesses with an immediate tax deduction of 100 per cent of the
cost of vehicles that emit less than 130 grams of carbon dioxide
per kilometre. Under current rules low-emission vehicles are treated
the same as inefficient vehicles and can be expensed at the rate
of 30 per cent per year (40 per cent for taxis and rental vehicles).
The UK introduced such a measure in 2002.
-
Introduce
a sliding scale for the inclusion into income of the use of a company
car by an employee. Currently 24 per cent of the vehicle list price
is added to an employees taxable income for the personal use
of a company vehicle. All vehicles are currently treated the same
from the dirtiest to the most efficient. The UK recently introduced
a tax measure whereby inefficient vehicles, such as the Ford Expedition,
are taxed at 35 per cent and lower emission vehicles, such as the
Honda Civic, are taxed at only 15 per cent.
-
Support
and encourage investment in climate friendly car manufacturing in
Canada. General Motors is evaluating whether to produce hybrid vehicles
at its Ingersoll and Oshawa plants. (The federal government has
established a $500 million fund for supporting auto investment in
Canada. Ontario has matched that amount.)
Alternative
and Complimentary Policies
The federal government is already pursuing a number of policy initiatives
to increase the market penetration of climate friendly vehicles and
to encourage better fuel consumption habits among Canadians. The effectiveness
of these initiatives will dramatically increased by implementing regulation
and incentive programs as outlined above.
Aside
from the aforementioned fiscal recommendations, the federal government
could enact market share regulations similar to California whereby carmakers
must meet increasingly stringent minimum sales criteria for specific
vehicle types. Californias Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) program,
for instance, requires that 10 per cent of each carmakers sales
must meet ZEV equivalency.17 A feebate system could also
be implemented to increase market penetration of low emission vehicles.
Under this policy, a fee is placed on the sale of inefficient vehicles
and the revenue from the fee is used to finance a rebate for the purchase
of climate friendly vehicles. The rebate for Green Cars
as described in this text, would support and enhance all of these policy
alternatives.
Contact
Shawn-Patrick Stensil
Sierra Club of Canada
613-241-4611
top
of page
|
13
|
Based
on the deployment of available and affordable technologies, the
governments target for passenger vehicles foresees 5.2 MT
reduction in greenhouse gas emissions vehicles fleets in 2010
and increasing to a 14.1 MT reduction in 2020 as older vehicles
are taken off the road. Please see: Progress on Canadas
Greenhouse Gas Strategy, Peter Reilly-Roe, Assistant Director,
Transportation Energy Use Division, Office of Energy Efficiency,
Natural Resources Canada.
|
|
14
|
Bill
1493, or the Pavley Law as it is popularly known, directs the
California Air Resources Board (CARB) to adopt regulations to
achieve the maximum feasible and cost-effective reduction
of greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles. CARBs
cost and feasibility analysis assumes the adoption of similar
regulations by Canada and other North Eastern American states
for a market of approximately 4 to 5 million vehicles. Both
Californias and Canadas auto markets sell approximately
1.7 million vehicles each annually. For information on Californias
greenhouse gas emission targets, please see the California Air
Resources Boards staff report on the feasible reductions
in greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles. Available at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/cc.htm
|
|
15
|
15
Section 177 of the U.S. Clean Air Act allows any state
that does not meet one of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
to adopt Californias auto emission standards. Maine, Massachusetts,
New York, Vermont, Connecticut, New Jersey and Rhode Island
have all chosen to adopt Californias LEV II standard over
the U.S. federal Tier 2 standard. LEV II calls for reductions
in nitrogen oxide, hydrocarbons and particulate matter over
and above the Tier 2 standard. LEV II standards will be in full
effect when Californias new greenhouse gas emission standard
takes effect in 2009. The California Air Resources Board has
accounted for this in its technical analysis. Consequently,
any state that wishes to adopt Californias greenhouse
gas emission standards must also adopt the LEV II.
|
| 16 |
These
emission ratings approximate the emissions from hybrid vehicles. |
|
17
|
Under the ZEV program, carmakers meet their ZEV quota by selling
certain low-emission technologies. Carmakers can meet 4 per cent
of the ZEV quota, for instance, by selling hybrid electric vehicles.
Carmakers must also make 250 zero emission vehicles nationwide
between 2005 and 2008. For more information, please see: http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/zevprog/zevprog.htm
|
|