|
Recommendations
for Budget 2005
back to Table of Contents
Shifting
Tax Incentives from Virgin Mineral Extraction to Recycling of Metals
Summary
Recommendation: that the federal government shift tax incentives from
the extraction of virgin minerals to measures favouring the recycling
and
conservation of minerals.
Investment
This is a tax shift and will result in no net loss or gain.
Benefits
for Canadians
Pollution prevention mining produces one million tones of waste
rock and 950,000 tonnes of toxic tailings annually, often requiring
perpetual care and maintenance. This is more than twenty times the amount
of municipal solid waste generated each year by all of the residences,
industries, commercial establishments, and institutions in Canada combined.27
According to the US Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries, recycling
steel results on a 97 per cent mining waste reduction and a 76 per cent
water pollution reduction
energy savings on metal production: zinc 60 per cent, Steel
74 per cent, copper 85 per cent28. Falconbridge Nickel
mines in Ontario presently consumes as much electricity as 250,000 homes29
reductions in GHG emissions: a tonne of aluminum produces four tonnes
of GHGs and a tonne of steel produces 0.8 tonnes of GHGs.30
Small increases in their rates of recycling would yield substantial
reductions in GHG emissions reduce human health risk and associated
public health costs. Heavy metals released by mining are a significant
contributor to poor health in communities such as Sudbury, Port Colborne,
Lynn Lake, Trail, Labrador City and Rouyn Noranda. Over 60,000 tonnes
of particulate matter are released into the atmosphere from tailings
in Canada each year, while the metal smelting sector is a leading source
of a range of heavy metals, including cadmium, mercury, lead, nickel
and arsenic, as well as acid rain precursors, such as sulphur dioxide31
Background
and Rationale
The enormous negative externalities of the minerals we take for granted
must be considered in government policy and industry practice. This
means treasuring the minerals that have already been extracted and reducing
the need for mining wherever possible. Many more jobs and more sustainable
economies can be created in the minerals industry if the focus shifts
from mining to the re-use of minerals already taken from the ground
and to value-added production in Canada.
In
the last decade a number of voices have been expressing growing concern
about Canadas special tax treatment for the extraction of virgin
minerals:
-
The
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development recommended
in its 2000 report on Canada that, the preferential tax treatment
of conventional resource sectors, such as oil and gas, and minerals
and metals should be eliminated on both environmental and
economic grounds.32
-
Principle
8 of the 1992 Rio Declaration and Chapter 4 of Agenda 21
Changing Consumption Patterns committed the parties to the elimination
of unsustainable patterns of production and consumption.33
It has been estimated that, to achieve sustainability worldwide,
the material intensity of each unit of economic output will need
to be reduced by 50 per cent and, in industrial countries like Canada,
it will have to fall by factors of between four and ten.34
-
A
1995 Report prepared for the Canadian Council of Ministers of the
Environment that found tax expenditure provided by federal and provincial
governments displays a bias against recycling, and stated that recycled
materials would have to taxed 13 per cent lower than virgin material
for optimal waste reduction
-
A
peer-reviewed article by Kimberley Sharf of the University of Warwick,
drew the following conclusions: The Canadian tax system significantly
favours the use of virgin materials rather than recycled materials
in the case of metal and glass products
. Sharf found
that Metal produced with virgin material has a Canada-wide
weighted average tax rate of 23.4 per cent, while metal produced
with recycled material has a rate of 27.9 per cent35
Metals
are especially good candidates for recycling and conservation. Metals
do not lose their mechanical or metallurgical properties when recycled,
while retaining their economic value. As a result metals can be re-used
and recycled through the economy almost without limit.36
Even
while a mine is operating, employment and income potential is likely
to be relatively short term. This trend is the result of a decline in
the average operating period for new mines, and the technological developments
that are constantly displacing workers. Most new mines only last 10-15
years.37 Mining also results in socio-economic costs including:
health impacts; work injuries; boom and bust economic cycles; the destruction
of indigenous livelihoods; and dramatic changes in regional cultures.38
According
to the 1998 report of the Minister of Finances Technical Committee
on Business Taxation, the federal tax rate on Canadas mining and
oil and gas sectors is the lowest of all sectors.39 The marginal
tax rate is 8.7 per cent, and the federal effective corporate tax rate
is 6 per cent. Although the February 2003 budget discontinued the Resource
Allowance for mining, it also phased in a reduction of the corporate
tax rate to 21 per cent. Federal subsidies for the exploration and development
of new mines in Canada have historically been justified because of the
resulting employment and other economic benefits. However, the number
of workers employed in mining has fallen dramatically, from a high of
70,038 in 1974 to 29,248 in 2000.40 Contribution to GDP of
metal mining fell by eight per cent from 1994-2000. Recommendation
Shift federal government support for mining exploration to tax measures
supporting the recycling and conservation of metals.
Alternative
and Complementary Policies
The Green Budget Coalition also recommends: an environmental and long-term
social impact assessment process that includes an evaluation of the
need for the material in a given mining proposal; incentives and legislation
to encourage the recycling of metals from landfills and obsolete industrial
and commercial structures; the use of bar codes and other identifiers
to enable the separation of complex alloys; legislation forbidding the
use of certain toxic metals (e.g. cadmium, mercury and lead ) in steel
production in order to facilitate recycling.
Contacts
Joan Kuyek
MiningWatch Canada
613-569-3439
Mark
Winfield
Pembina Institute
613-235-6288 ext. 25
top
of page
|
27
|
Total municipal solid waste generation in Canada is estimated
to be approximately 30 million tonnes per year.
|
|
28
|
US
Environmental Protection Agency
|
|
29
|
Carol Mulligan, The Sudbury Star, Mining cant afford
hydro hike: hearing, August 25, 2004
|
|
30
|
R. Sage, Implications of Canadas GHG Programs for
Metals and Recycling Industries, CANMET-CARI-European Commission
Environmentally Clean Technologies for Sustainable Production
and Consumption Workshop Proceedings,
NRCan, 2003.
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
The
report of the High-Level Advisory Group on the Environment to
the Secretary-General of the OECD; November 25, 1997. http://www.oecd.org/subject/sustdev/hlage.htm,
p.10.
|
|
33
|
See,
in particular, Art. 4.18.
|
|
34
|
The
need for a 90 per cent reduction in material intensity in OECD
countries was acknowledged in the October 1994 Carnoules Declaration,
endorsed by prominent individuals including the former executive
directors of the Business Council for Sustainable Development
and the Brundtland Commission (in T. Green, Lasting Benefits
from Beneath the Earth, 1998:69).
|
| 35 |
Sharf,
K, Tax Incentives for the Extraction and Recycling of Basic
Materials in Canada, Fiscal Studies, (1999) vol. 20, no.4,
pp.451-477 |
| 36 |
Natural Resources Canada, Metals and Minerals Policy of Canada,
(Ottawa: Government of Canada, 1996), p.12. |
| 37 |
Pembina
Institute: Looking Beneath the Surface, 2002
|
| 38 |
see
Mining and Communities : a Literature Review and Annotated
bibliography (Ottawa: MiningWatch Canada, 2000) |
| 39 |
Technical
Committee on Business Taxation report (Ottawa Department of Finance
1998, Tables 3.10 and 4.1) |
|
40
|
Canadian
Minerals Yearbook
|
|