|
|
Recommendations for Budget 2006 Recommendation Investment Required Benefits for Canadians
Background and Rationale: As discussed in the Introduction, the Green Budget Coalition believes a government-wide Natural Capital Framework would be an important means of integrating the value of environmental goods and services into its decision-making processes. Implementing such an ambitious framework for the conservation of our national biological diversity will require the engagement of many groups and sectors in integrated decision-making processes at the local, regional and national levels: provincial, territorial, municipal and First Nations governments, as well as civil society, community groups, universities, private citizens and the private sector. In other words, a national goal for conserving natural capital is not the exclusive responsibility of the federal government, but requires broad participaton from all sectors of Canadian society. For example, the comprehensive integrated land-use planning exercises needed now, in advance of development in the few remaining industrially unallocated landscapes in Canada, will require substantive participation from local and Aboriginal communities, and environmental organisations. Unfortunately, many of these groups lack the resources and capacity to meaningfully engage. To ensure their equitable participation in the full range of current and future integrated decision-making, land-use planning and local stewardship initiatives, the Green Budget Coalition is requesting that the Canadian Government contribute $250 million to establish a highly leveraged National Conservation Fund. Many Canadian organizations and individuals have valuable skills and resources to contribute to a shared goal of nature conservation. By investing in this leadership conservation fund, the federal government would provide an incentive to bring these potential partners to the table, as well as to leverage the funds to achieve greater results. Working together is clearly more effective than “going it alone”. Modeled in part on the existing federal-provincial infrastructure program, and supported by a similar recommendation from the National Round Table on Environment and the Economy’s 2003 report on Nature Conservation,9 our proposal for a leveraged National Conservation Fund will provide not only good economic value, but will encourage creativity and flexibility in conservation initiatives. Partnership conservation programs such as the Natural Legacy 2000 initiative conserved hundreds of thousands of acres of Canada’s vast wilderness areas, and conducted research on endangered species recovery and conservation planning. Furthermore, through this program, conservation groups leveraged a federal investment of $10 million to deliver a program worth almost $40 million on the ground. Applying this formula to a National Conservation Fund means that $1 billion of conservation value could be achieved from a $250 million federal leadership investment. A National Conservation Fund should focus support on the following key priorities:
Canada has international and national commitments to conservation that have yet to be fulfilled. The federal government could work independently to fulfill the commitments for which there is clear federal jurisdiction. However, this approach would be less efficient and effective than working cooperatively with all interests. A leadership investment in a highly leveraged National Conservation Fund would support a cooperative, efficient approach to conservation that would complement existing federal programs. See Ongoing Recommendations, pages 21-24, for recommendations for:
Contacts:
Julie Gelfand, Nature Canada 613-562-3447 ext.231 ______________________________________________________________ 8. Securing Canada’s Natural Capital: A Vision for Nature Conservation in the 21st Century. National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy, 2003, 125pp. (p 94) back to text 9. Securing Canada’s Natural Capital: A Vision for Nature Conservation in the 21st Century. National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy, 2003, 125pp. see Recommendation 19 (p. 90) back to text |